I see the federal government shifting into blame mode, deciding to deflect the blame they rightly earned to state and local government officials. This is what the movement for state's rights by feds means. The opportunity to divest themselves of responsibility for anything that happens within the nation. It's shameful in the extreme. This should, but of course won't, shift the tide back to a movement for our national government to be the ultimate caregiver to the nation that puts them in power. New Orleans is part of America, not part of the nation of Louisiana. These are thousands of Americans - not African-Americans, not poor Americans, not southern Americans, not red state or blue state Americans, but Americans. Truman, the bastard, even had the class to say The Buck Stops Here. That's the Oval Office. Not the Mississippi Bridge out of New Orleans.
It's states right, not state's responsibilities. If New Haven Connecticut were underwater, or Williamsburg, VA, or Galveston, TX, you better believe this would look different. Is Connecticut or Virginia, or Texas any less a state worthy of rights? Or less responsible for catastrophe? Then explain to me the difference.
I honestly don't believe that the federal government targeted New Orleans for criminal neglect. But I do think it chose to take a calculated risk to underfund emergency planning there, in favor or a war, tax cuts, and comforting the comfortable. This is but a peek at what that really costs.